Overview
October 23, 2026 in London Learn How Engineering Orgs Adopt AI In Practice A fully packed day built for engineering leaders navigating AI adoption. Two tracks of talks, panel discussions, and an Unconference — all in one day. Real-world insights from startups to tech giants, plus open discussions where you set the agenda. Takeaways you can actually use, connections that'll change how you lead.
Speakers
24
Alexandru-Daniel TufaYelp
Andrei MalyhinFlo Health
Anna J McDougallHashiCorp / IBM
Carlos Fuentes
Daniil MazepinCoreWeave
Daria StroganovaMeta
Dünya KirkaliRemote.com
Eugene SergueevFlo Health Inc
Fabio DiasUniversity of Surrey
Freddie TibblesModomics & Tesco
Gregor OjstersekEngineering Leadership newsletter
John AdibZapp
Show all 24 speakers
Schedule
Opening Ceremony
Why Software Fundamentals Still Matter
How to Build AI-Native Engineering Teams
2 years ago, the engineering team's structure was fairly standardized, 2-pizza cross-functional teams and an engineering manager leading the team. These days, everyone is figuring it out as they go, making adjustments and seeing what may work and what not.In this talk, Gregor will share how companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, Shutterstock and others build engineering teams in the AI era. He will also share his recommendation on the best structure for a specific type of organization.
One Team, Many AIs
AI is giving developers unprecedented autonomy. Every engineer can now create their own workflow, combining coding agents, prompts, knowledge bases, and tools in different ways. While this can dramatically increase individual productivity, it introduces a new challenge for engineering leaders: maintaining consistency across teams.In this talk, we'll explore how AI is creating new forms of organizational drift, why team alignment matters more than ever, and practical approaches for building share
Beyond Rubber Ducking - Engineering in Times of AI (LLMs)
We used to explain our bugs to rubber ducks. Now, the duck talks back, writes code, and occasionally lies to our faces.LLMs are incredible tools. They can cure "blank screen syndrome," instantly write boilerplate, and explain weird legacy code. But treating them like senior engineers is a massive trap.
Usage Lies - What Actually Proves an Internal AI Tool Works
Our telemetry dashboard was green — a bug-fixer skill firing hundreds of times a week, a test-coverage agent running on every diff, manual-tester agents driving browser test cases across products, security reviews kicking off across teams, daily active users climbing. And I still couldn't answer one question: did any of it make us better? Every usage metric was lying. This talk is how we drove real adoption of an internal AI plugin marketplace across 30+ engineering teams — hands-on workshops an
Coffee break
Your Coding Agent Is Only as Good as Your Company’s Memory
Teams often start agent adoption by adding tools: MCP servers, API wrappers, chat interfaces in developer portals. But once coding agents move from local help into real delivery workflows, they usually fail earlier than the tool call. They read stale ownership, conflicting runbooks, missing deploy history, and policies that were written for humans.This talk introduces company memory as the missing layer for production coding agents: trustworthy, permission-aware engineering context that agents c
Panel Discussion: Manager or Maker? The Leadership Identity Crisis
Faster and Lonelier: AI, Isolation, and the Erosion of Engineering Collaboration
AI makes individual engineers faster - and quietly more isolated.As coding agents become everyone's default pair, the collaboration that keeps an org healthy erodes: pairing fades, context gets trapped in private chat histories, knowledge stops diffusing, teams drift into silos.Velocity dashboards look great, so nothing seems wrong - until onboarding slows and bus-factor spikes.This talk names the failure mode, explains why standard metrics miss it, and shows what leaders can do to keep teams co
Putting a Ceiling on the Thing You Just Told Everyone to Use
AI usage grows, cost follows, and leadership asks you to control it. The instinct is to reach straight for a spending cap. Our concern was that doing so would undermine the adoption we had encouraged, while the arithmetic showed that a daily limit would not control the overall budget anyway.This case study follows the design of cost governance for AI development tooling across an engineering organisation while adoption continues to evolve. Governance that has any chance of sticking depends as mu